Suzuki Grand Vitara 2003 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 19 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 88 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 33 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |