Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 87 HP | 99 HP | |
Torque: | 216 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 25.1 seconds | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 11.0 | |
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.86 m | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara is 50 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |