Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 29 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 84 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.5 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1315 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |