Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998 vs Jeep Cherokee 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 128 HP | 127 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 234 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 1 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 60 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 12.3 | |
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 76 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.63 m | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 932 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1954 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`087 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
| |