Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 318 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 74 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 144 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 14.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 15.7 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 735 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 5.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 29 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Pajero engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 8 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |