Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 128 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.1 seconds | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 13 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 66 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 71 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
| |