Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Suzuki Grand Vitara) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 14 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 96 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 31 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |