Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 23 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 5 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Land Rover Freelander, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |