Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Mazda Tribute 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda Tribute, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mazda Tribute. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda Tribute 2004 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 4 cm longer than the Mazda Tribute, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | 2245 litres | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 294 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |