Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 1 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 15 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Suzuki Grand Vitara has 246 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Suzuki Grand Vitara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |