Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 129 HP | 112 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 17 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
770 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.45 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Land Rover Freelander, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |