Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 11 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 5 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | 955 litres | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has 158 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 996 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Honda CR-V quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |