Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 129 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 21 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
770 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Nissan X-Trail 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 479 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | 1742 litres | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has 81 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 209 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`170 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |