Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 11 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 17 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 1 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has 143 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 260 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |