Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Toyota RAV4 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 233 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 291 NM | 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 40 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Despite less power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 11.2 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 16 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Suzuki Grand Vitara has 52 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Suzuki Grand Vitara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |