Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Suzuki Grand Vitara) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Freelander) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 233 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 291 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 73 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 109 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.7 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 465 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 560 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara and Land Rover Freelander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 755 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 357 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |