Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 233 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 291 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 83 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.7 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 158 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |