Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 54 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 72 NM more than Opel Mokka. Thanks to more power Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 6.5 | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 480 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Grand Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Opel Astra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has 42 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 614 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`959 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |
