Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 52 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 6.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 16 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX 2010 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is larger. Suzuki Grand Vitara and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 21 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 461 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |