Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 19 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Grand Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is larger. Suzuki Grand Vitara and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has 14 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 461 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |