Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 11 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 8 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 322 litres | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has more luggage capacity. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 76 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |