Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 21 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Megane | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Grand Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is larger. Suzuki Grand Vitara and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 21 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |