Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Ford EcoSport 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 34 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Grand Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is larger. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 3 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, 5 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1238 litres | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has more luggage capacity. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 65 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |