Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Suzuki Grand Vitara) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 67 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 215 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 60 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
516 litres | 1773 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 295 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 1257 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1.4 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |