Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 3 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.6 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 57 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
516 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 295 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |