Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 4 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.6 | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Grand Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2010 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
516 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 402 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 1236 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |