Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 3 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 58 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
516 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 419 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |