Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Subaru Forester 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 - 166 HP | 147 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 225 NM | 196 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 14.4 seconds | 6 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 9.2 | 6.3 - 11.0 | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 57 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
516 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 266 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`863 | ~ 2`016 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |