Suzuki Grand Vitara 1997 vs Honda CR-V 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Suzuki Grand Vitara is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 - 158 HP | 128 - 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 270 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 19.8 seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 11.0 | 9.7 - 10.2 | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 34 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 258 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1080 litres | 670 litres | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has 117 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`863 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |