Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Suzuki Grand Vitara also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.9 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 - 229 HP | 141 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 - 300 NM | 196 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13.6 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 11.3 | 7.1 - 9.6 | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Suzuki Grand Vitara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 691 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | 1742 litres | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Grand Vitara has 212 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 209 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`070 | ~ 2`079 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |