Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.2 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 - 233 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 - 291 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.6 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 158 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`123 | ~ 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |