Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota RAV4 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 - 169 HP | 150 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 198 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 14.4 seconds | 9.3 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.7 | 6.0 - 9.6 | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Suzuki Grand Vitara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 182 - 191 mm (7.2 - 7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Grand Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 14 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 188 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 994 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`057 | ~ 2`137 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |