Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Jeep Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 2.4 - 3.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 - 169 HP | 147 - 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 224 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 14.4 seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.7 | 9.9 - 14.6 | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee. On average, Suzuki Grand Vitara equipped with diesel engines consume 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 24 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`057 | ~ 2`784 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |