Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Suzuki Vitara can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Suzuki Vitara also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 - 169 HP | 117 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 14.4 seconds | 9.5 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.7 | 4.0 - 5.7 | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Vitara. On average, Suzuki Grand Vitara equipped with diesel engines consume 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Grand Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is larger. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 8 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 4 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
758 litres | 1120 litres | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has 23 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Vitara (by 362 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`057 kg | ~ 1`761 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`595 kg | ~ 1`189 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 462 kg | ~ 572 kg | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Suzuki Vitara. Therefore, Suzuki Vitara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |