Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi ASX can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi ASX also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 - 169 HP | 114 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 154 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 14.4 seconds | 10.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.7 | 4.6 - 8.1 | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, Suzuki Grand Vitara equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 170 - 195 mm (6.7 - 7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Grand Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.62 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 4 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 44 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 461 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`057 | ~ 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |