Suzuki Baleno 1998 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Baleno engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Baleno reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Baleno consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Baleno could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Baleno consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Baleno gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Baleno engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Jimny, Suzuki Wagon R+ | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine: Engines with higher mileage tend to lose oil both through combustion and leaks, with consumption becoming noticeable past 150,000 km. Around the same time, the timing chain may stretch as the hydraulic ... More about Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.53 m | |
| Suzuki Baleno is 47 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Baleno is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Suzuki Baleno can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |