Suzuki Baleno 1995 vs Volvo V40 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Suzuki Baleno engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.3 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Baleno consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Baleno could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen Xantia, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V40 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Baleno is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Baleno is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1377 litres | 1421 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Suzuki Baleno has 96 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |