Suzuki Baleno 1995 vs Volvo V40 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Suzuki Baleno engine produces 20 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.6 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Baleno consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Baleno could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Baleno is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Baleno is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1377 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |