Suzuki Baleno 1995 vs Toyota Corolla 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 96 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Baleno engine produces 14 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Baleno reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Baleno consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Baleno could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Baleno consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Baleno might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
| Suzuki Baleno and Toyota Corolla are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Baleno has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |