Suzuki Baleno 1995 vs Subaru Impreza 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 96 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Subaru Impreza is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Baleno engine produces 122 HP less power than Subaru Impreza, whereas torque is 158 NM less than Subaru Impreza. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Baleno reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Baleno is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Baleno consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza, which means that by driving the Suzuki Baleno over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Baleno consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Baleno gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Vitara | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Baleno might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Baleno is 2 cm shorter than the Subaru Impreza, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Baleno is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 1.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Impreza, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Subaru Impreza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Baleno has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Subaru Impreza, so Subaru Impreza quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |