Suzuki Baleno 1998 vs Hyundai Accent 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 96 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 134 NM | 134 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Hyundai Accent is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Baleno engine produces 6 HP less power than Hyundai Accent, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Baleno reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
By specification Suzuki Baleno consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Accent, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Baleno could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Baleno consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Accent. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
680 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
Suzuki Baleno is 30 cm shorter than the Hyundai Accent, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 321 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 859 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`555 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Suzuki Baleno has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Accent has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Suzuki Baleno, so Suzuki Baleno quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Hyundai Accent has
| |