Suzuki Baleno 1998 vs Audi S3 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 96 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Audi S3 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Baleno engine produces 114 HP less power than Audi S3, whereas torque is 136 NM less than Audi S3. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Baleno reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 9.1 | |
|
The Suzuki Baleno is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Baleno consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi S3, which means that by driving the Suzuki Baleno over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is smaller. Suzuki Baleno is 26 cm shorter than the Audi S3, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Baleno is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1020 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 1.5 metres less than that of the Audi S3, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Audi S3 has
| |