Suzuki Baleno 2016 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014

 
Suzuki Baleno
2016 - 2019
Volkswagen Polo
2014 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP75 HP
Torque: 120 NM95 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds14.3 seconds
Suzuki Baleno is more dynamic to drive.
Suzuki Baleno engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Suzuki Baleno reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.24.8
Real fuel consumption: 4.9 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Suzuki Baleno is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki Baleno consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Suzuki Baleno over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Baleno consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 37 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway1070 km on highway
750 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m3.97 m
Width: 1.75 m1.68 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Suzuki Baleno is larger.
Suzuki Baleno is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Baleno is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1085 litres952 litres
Suzuki Baleno has more luggage capacity.
Suzuki Baleno has 75 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Baleno (by 133 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`405 kg1`570 kg
Safety:
Volkswagen Polo scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Polo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 58005400
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Baleno has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv