Suzuki Baleno 2016 vs Hyundai i20 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i20 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Baleno engine produces 8 HP less power than Hyundai i20, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Hyundai i20. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Baleno reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Baleno is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Baleno consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Baleno could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Baleno consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i20 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai Kona | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i20 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i20 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Baleno is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai i20, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1085 litres | 1042 litres | |
|
Suzuki Baleno has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Baleno has 29 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i20. The Hyundai i20 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Baleno (by 43 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai i20 scores higher in safety tests. The Hyundai i20 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |