Suzuki Baleno 2016 vs Nissan Micra 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Baleno engine produces 22 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Suzuki Baleno reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Baleno is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Baleno consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Baleno could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Baleno consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Micra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Baleno and Nissan Micra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1085 litres | 1004 litres | |
|
Suzuki Baleno has more luggage capacity. Suzuki Baleno has 55 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Baleno (by 81 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`530 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Micra scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Micra scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |