Suzuki Baleno 1998 vs Seat Arosa 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suzuki Baleno is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Seat Arosa has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 96 HP | 50 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10 - 17.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 4.3 - 7.6 | |
|
Suzuki Baleno petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Arosa. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is larger, but lower. Suzuki Baleno is 36 cm longer than the Seat Arosa, 5 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Baleno is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 0.7 metres less than that of the Seat Arosa, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`409 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Seat Arosa has
| |