Suzuki Baleno 1998 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suzuki Baleno is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Colt has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.3 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 96 HP | 75 - 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 108 - 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.9 - 8.4 | |
|
Suzuki Baleno petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is larger. Suzuki Baleno is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 1 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Baleno is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`471 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |