Suzuki Baleno 1998 vs Citroen Xsara 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suzuki Baleno is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Citroen Xsara has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 96 HP | 68 - 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 112 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 5.2 - 9.1 | |
|
Suzuki Baleno petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is smaller. Suzuki Baleno is 27 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 1.3 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |