Suzuki Baleno 1998 vs Audi S3 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Suzuki Baleno is available with front wheel drive, while Audi S3 can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 96 HP | 210 - 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 270 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 6.6 - 6.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 9.1 - 9.4 | |
|
Suzuki Baleno petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi S3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is smaller. Suzuki Baleno is 26 cm shorter than the Audi S3, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Baleno is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1020 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 1.5 metres less than that of the Audi S3, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`958 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Audi S3 has
| |