Suzuki Baleno 1998 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 96 HP | 103 - 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 124 - 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.3 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 5.7 - 8.7 | |
|
Suzuki Baleno petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 145. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is smaller. Suzuki Baleno is 16 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 145, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Baleno is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Baleno is 1.6 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 145, which means Suzuki Baleno can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Baleno has
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has
| |